Blaming Bush for New Orleans disaster is irrational
Blaming President Bush for the evil that emerged from New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina makes as much sense as blaming him for the Beslan massacre in Russia a year ago. It doesn't hold water (no pun intended).
Nicole Gelinas writing in the City Journal, succinctly points out the true causes of the New Orleans disaster -- the city residents and officials themselves. Here are some excerpts from her clear-eyed column:
In truth, the looters, rapists, and murderers who have terrorized New Orleans since Monday began their post-Katrina reign of terror a full day before the situation grew truly desperate -- and it was their increasingly lawless behavior that kept willing but unarmed professional and volunteer rescue workers away from the city and from the poor people who needed saving.
Katrina didn't turn innocent citizens into desperate criminals. This week's looters (not those who took small supplies of food and water for sustenance, but those who have trashed, burned, and shot their way through the city since Monday) are the same depraved individuals who have pushed New Orleans' murder rate to several multiples above the national average in normal times. (New Orleans, without Katrina, would have likely ended 2005 with 330 or so murders -- compared to about 65 in Boston, a city roughly the same in size.) Today may not be the best day to get into New Orleans' intractable crime problem, but it's necessary, since it explains how this week's communications and policing vacuum so quickly created a perfect storm for the vicious lawlessness that has broken out.
New Orleans, first off, doesn't have the middle-class or affluent tax base to afford the professional police or prosecution force it needs, crime has created a vicious cycle, pushing out taxpayers who fund the police.
The "blame Bush first" crowd seems to blame every American happenstance, no matter how trivial or no matter how far removed from the responsibility of the federal government, on President Bush. Whether its the spread of West Nile virus, the dismal Summer in Oregon, or the accidental breaking of little Suzie's doll by little Sally, the "blame Bush first" crowd seems to be able to make a link to the President. Sadly, such accusations, which used to be the purview of the looney left, now seem to be filtering down to Republicans and Libertarians. It is not just a symptom of lazy thinking, it is irrational.
And, this matters.
When normally rational people start engaging in irrational indictment of competant, legitimate authority, they contribute to the undermining of all social order. To put it another way, irrational thinking and discourse brings New Orleans-type anarchy that much closer for all of us.
The irrationality is so seductive that even Gelinas gets into it a bit at the end of her piece when she criticizes the slow response of the federal government to the disaster. She is wrong. The looting of New Orleans did not happen because of Katrina. New Orleans knew it was living dangerously. The city was warned to prepare over and over by reputable scientists and other government officials. It had the entire last century to prepare it's infrastructure to handle a hurricane like Katrina. It failed to do so. The city had decades to have effective emergency plans and adequate supplies for its citizens in place, particularly for a disaster which everyone knew was likely to happen! The fact that the city did not prepare is no one else's fault. The looting of New Orleans is the very predictable result of decades of corruption, mismanagement, and incompetence by its own, Democrat city officials, and decades of stifling and paralyzing government dependency on the part of tens of thousands of its own citizens.
It is certainly NOT the fault of a Texan named George W. Bush, currently a resident of Washington, D.C..
Gelinas' entire column can be found here.












8 comments:
I think the looting and killing could be pinned squarely upon the behinds of those that have expanded the social welfare system.
That is a system that has rewarded idleness and single motherhood.
If I am not mistaken wasn't Ronald Reagan's "Welfare Queen," living in New Orleans?
I agree, we cannot blame George Bush for these events.
I guess I will never understand how people can take a disaster and turn it into an opportunity for personal gain (looting)and instead of offering a helping hand, they feel that they must add to the devastation by destroying.
I remember when television used to run public-service announcements, there was a group the kids walking down the street and one broke off a car antenna.
In the next scene, this same kid is in the car with his father, turns on the radio and only hear static... then the camera pans over to their antenna, and somebody had broken it off.
No, George Bush is not responsible for this... I feel it is just a lack of honor and pride among the general populace that is to blame.
but I will put blame on the government for its lack of leading by example.
Corruption, lying, and manipulation of the system have become the excepted norm.
I also very much agree with the point that coyote is making as well.
I would like to comment that New Orleans has always been known for crime which equals looters. When all police presence left the scene the criminal element did what it always does - steel everything not tied down. The looting in New Orleans isn't anything surprising; they do the same thing daily anyways it just isn't as pronounced.
As the left talks endlessly of what the looting of New Orleans means about America it just reminds me again of how bankrupt their logic is.
Also - I don't blame the president for the response to Katrina. His main role in this disaster or any other is to approve a big check being cut to help with clean-up and mobilizing federal organizations to help the local public officials. The biggest way to spot that this isn't W's fault is to look at how heavily the race card is being played out in this disaster. There is so little blame to place the left has to dig real deep and call him a racists - a unrebuttable argument.
READ THIS!!!
And then tell me whose to blame!!!!
http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/theme_home2.jsp
Preparing America
In the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster or other large-scale emergency, the Department of Homeland Security will assume primary responsibility on March 1st for ensuring that emergency response professionals are prepared for any situation. This will entail providing a coordinated, comprehensive federal response to any large-scale crisis and mounting a swift and effective recovery effort.
If I am not mistaken the Hurricane happened at the end of August!!!
Primary Responsibility = PRIMARY BLAME!
Many are saying that the reason the Federal Government didn't react quickly enough was because the population of New Orleans are predominately Black. I don't think that was the reason. I think the reason was that New Orleans was "Fly Over" country. Hell, if it doesn't happen in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, New York or DC, then it really isn't happening in America is it? Such is the mindset of the elitists who rule our country. If it happened in one of the major urban centers in America the response would have been much quicker. But since it happened in "fly over" country it really wasn't as important. After all, all the elites in DC really don't have any friends or family in the effected areas. Heck, they look at "that part of the world" with contempt.
And what the hell is up with Bush calling the Hurricane effected areas "this part of the world". He said that at least four times in his Friday Press Conference.
And why did he go to California on Monday?
Jeff,
I don't think I should really give a flying fsck why he went ot California on Monday.
The Washington Post plants the blame squarely on Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco.
And you, Jeff, better be willing to take one of YOUR own papers to task for it.
Assmunch.
'Time' reports discrepancy on Brown's background
WASHINGTON (AP) — The official biography for Michael Brown, the beleaguered head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, contains a discrepancy about his background in emergency management, Time magazine reported.
A 2001 press release on the White House Web site says that Brown worked for the city of Edmond, Okla., from 1975 to 1978 "overseeing emergency services divisions."
AFP
Brown
Brown's official biography on the FEMA Web site says that his background in state and local government also includes serving as "an assistant city manager with emergency services oversight" and as a city councilman.
But a former mayor of Edmond, Randel Shadid, told The Associated Press on Friday that Brown had been an assistant to the city manager. Shadid said Brown was never assistant city manager.
"I think there's a difference between the two positions," said Shadid. "I would think that is a discrepancy."
Asked later about the White House news release that said Brown oversaw Edmond's emergency services divisions, Shadid said, "I don't think that's a total stretch."
Time magazine first reported the discrepancy.
Separately, Newsday reported another discrepancy regarding Brown's background. The official White House announcement of Brown's nomination to head FEMA in January 2003 lists his previous experience as "the Executive Director of the Independent Electrical Contractors," a trade group based in Alexandria, Va.
Two officials of the group told Newsday this week that Brown never was the national head of the group but did serve as the executive director of a regional chapter, based in Colorado.
Brown has become a primary target of criticism that the federal government responded too slowly to Hurricane Katrina, with many calls for his dismissal.
Regarding the discrepancy about his job in Oklahoma, Claudia Deakins, head of public relations for the city of Edmond, said, "According to our personnel records, Mike Brown was an assistant to the city manager from 1977 to 1980. I can't speak to his role in the organization or the structure of the organization at the time because I wasn't here."
A longtime acquaintance, Carl Reherman, said Brown was very involved in helping set up an emergency operations center in Edmond and assisting in the creation of an emergency contingency plan in the 1970s, while Brown was working for the city manager. At the time, Reherman was a city councilman, and later became mayor.
Reherman said the emergency plan that Brown worked on dealt with potential natural disasters such as tornados and manmade disasters since Tinker Air Force Base and a commercial airport are nearby and a rail line passes through the downtown.
"From my experience with Mike, he not only worked very hard on everything he did, he had very high standards," said Reherman, who also knew Brown when he was a student taking classes from Reherman, who was a professor of political science at Central State University.
"I'm an old Democrat and Mike's a Republican, so we got into a lot of discussions," said Reherman.
Nicol Andrews, deputy strategic director in FEMA's office of public affairs, told Time that while Brown began as an intern, he became an "assistant city manager" with a distinguished record of service.
"According to Mike Brown," Andrews told Time, a large portion of points raised by the magazine are "very inaccurate."
White House press secretary Scott McClellan referred all questions about Brown's resume to FEMA.
McClellan said the White House's earlier statements that Brown retained the president's confidence remain true — but he declined to state that confidence outright.
"I'd leave it where I left it," McClellan said. "We appreciate the work of all those who have been working around the clock to respond to what has been on the worst natural disasters in our nation's history."
Here is a factual timeline of Katrina events;
http://www.thinkprogress.org/katrina-timeline
Read through it and tell me who is to blame?
Post a Comment