New Matt Lindland TV ad
Here is the latest Matt Lindland TV ad. I understand that his opponent (Suzanne VanOrman) sent a mailing out this weekend where she is trying to say that she will "protect the taxpayer" and "protect the kicker." Suzanne, you will protect the kicker? OK then what about the "corporate kicker?" Hmmm?
Hmmm.... OK she has changed her message in the last week of the campaign. Now why is that?
And do you really believe that VanOrman, who has supported a gas tax increase, suggested instituting a sales tax and defended the M50 tax increase, is actually a fiscal conservative?
Naw she isn't.
Posts
15 comments:
Oregon voters will not elect a mangled cage fighter to the Legislature.
Game over for Matt Lindland. Suzanne VanOrman wins.
anon 9:24,
Yer busted.
Mangled? Cage fighter? Sounds like you must be on the VanOrman staff.
Because everyone else in the world refers to the sport as "Mixed Martial Arts" or "Ultimate fighting." The only place it has been referred to as "cage fighting" has been in VO's TV ads. LOL...
Fact is that I don't think that district will elect a person who is in favor of the gas tax, the sales tax and putting the cigarette tax into the constitution.
VanOrman has been running for election for 25 years and mostly loosing.
No, it is not "game over." If it was the Democrats would not have staffers coming over to this blog to try to spin it the other way.
Of course it probably is not entirely fair to you in that my company has been doing work for the Lindland campaign and I have access to inside information.
Could be a long night for both candidates. However in a tough year for Republicans and considering that VanOrman spent an innordinate amount of money making personal lies the center piece of her campaign it really is surprising that she is struggling the way she is.
yip yip
Care to put your money where your mouth is and place a bet on the mangled cage fighter electoral chances?
You've sure hitched your wagon to some crazy candidates this year.
I have already put more on the line than you have.
Do you care to put your name and reputation on the line?
Didn't think so.
yip yip
"crazy candidates" this year?
I have been watching this blog for a couple of years and would like to know which "crazy" candidates that Coyote has "hitched" his wagon to this year.
anon 11:49,
Well I see you are unwilling to stake your reputation to anything.
Now because you are unwilling to do so and are still persuaded to make accusations and sniping comments while hiding behind your skirt of anonymity we have to assume that you are merely trying to post your electronic lawn signs in public areas.
You don't get to make this personal unless you disclose yourself.
Oh and the commenter above asks a good question. Got a "list" of those crazy candidates this year?
Oh but don't bother providing the list unless you disclose who you are so that everyone can find out what "crazy" candidates you support.
Until then.
buh bye
yip yip
anon 5:26,
Well you listed two mainstream candidates.
Unfortunately you decided to insert a lie and false accusation into your short screed.
buh bye
anon 11:47,
I am not just carrying water for Lindland but I am in other circles actively campaigning for him.
But again you don't get the point.
And rather than act like an adult you play the 5 year old child card. "What? What did I say? All I said was OK I'm going to bed."
Yah...
Now if you want to disagree like a mature adult, follow the rules? That's fine.
But you want to act like an insolent child full of hate and venom? Well you can head on over to a liberal blog for that.
buh bye.
yip yip
Anon 1:41,
Well, no, no one has "acknowledged" those "facts."
You are obviously ignorant.
Oh and I won't have a difficult time admitting anything.
yip yip
Actually and since you are willing to make it personal and are still afraid to admit who you are (must not be all to confident with your statements eh?) then we shall bid you adeu.
yip yip
buh bye
Or should I just call you "Kevin?"
Post a Comment